freemexy's Blog

Russia demands access to VPN providers’ servers

Russia demands access to VPN providers’ servers The Russian censorship agency Roskomnadzor has ordered 10 VPN service providers to link their servers in Russia to its network in order to stop users within the country from reaching banned sites.VPN service If they fail to comply, their services will be blocked, according to a machine translation of the order.The 10 VPN providers are ExpressVPN, HideMyAss!, Hola VPN, IPVanish, Kaspersky Secure Connection, KeepSolid, NordVPN, OpenVPN, TorGuard, and VyprVPN. In response at least five of the 10 – Express VPN, IPVanish, KeepSolid, NordVPN, TorGuard and – say they are tearing down their servers in Russia but continuing to offer their services to Russian customers if they can reach the providers’ servers located outside of Russia. A sixth provider, Kaspersky Labs, which is based in Moscow, says it will comply with the order. The other four could not be reached for this article. IPVanish characterized the order as another phase of “Russia’s censorship agenda” dating back to 2017 when the government enacted a law forbidding the use of VPNs to access blocked Web sites. “Up until recently, however, they had done little to enforce such rules,” IPVanish says in its blog. “These new demands mark a significant escalation.” The reactions of those not complying are similar. TorGuard says it has taken steps to remove all its physical servers from Russia. It is also cutting off its business with data centers in the region “We would like to be clear that this removal of servers was a voluntary decision by TorGuard management and no equipment seizure occurred,” TorGuard says in its blog. “We do not store any logs so even if servers were compromised it would be impossible for customer’s data to be exposed.” TorGuard says it is deploying more servers in adjacent countries to protect fast download speeds for customers in the region. IPVanish says it has faced similar demands from Russia before and responded similarly. In 2016, a new Russian law required online service providers to store customers’ private data for a year. “In response, we removed all physical server presence in Russia, while still offering Russians encrypted connections via servers outside of Russian borders,” the company says. “That decision was made in accordance with our strict zero-logs policy.”When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432

The VPN is dying, long live zero trust

The VPN is dying, long live zero trust The venerable VPN, which has for decades provided remote workers with a secure tunnel into the enterprise network, is facing extinction as enterprises migrate to a more agile, granular security framework called zero trust, which is better adapted to today’s world of digital business.VPN VPNs are part of a security strategy based on the notion of a network perimeter; trusted employees are on the inside and untrusted employees are on the outside. But that model no longer works in a modern business environment where mobile employees access the network from a variety of inside or outside locations, and where corporate assets reside not behind the walls of an enterprise data center, but in multi-cloud environments. Gartner predicts that by 2023, 60% of enterprises will phase out most of their VPNs in favor of zero trust network access, which can take the form of a gateway or broker that authenticates both device and user before allowing role-based, context-aware access. There are a variety of flaws associated with the perimeter approach to security. It doesn’t address insider attacks. It doesn’t do a good job accounting for contractors, third parties and supply-chain partners. If an attacker steals someone’s VPN credentials, the attacker can access the network and roam freely. Plus, VPNs over time have become complex and difficult to manage. “There’s a lot of pain around VPNs,” says Matt Sullivan, senior security architect at Workiva, an enterprise software company based in Ames, Iowa. “They’re clunky, outdated, there’s a lot to manage, and they’re a little dangerous, frankly.” At an even more fundamental level, anyone looking at the state of enterprise security today understands that whatever we’re doing now isn’t working. “The perimeter-based model of security categorically has failed,” says Forrester principal analyst Chase Cunningham. “And not from a lack of effort or a lack of investment, but just because it’s built on a house of cards. If one thing fails, everything becomes a victim. Everyone I talk to believes that.” Cunningham has taken on the zero-trust mantle at Forrester, where analyst Jon Kindervag, now at Palo Alto Networks, developed a zero-trust security framework in 2009. The idea is simple: trust no one. Verify everyone. Enforce strict access-control and identity-management policies that restrict employee access to the resources they need to do their job and nothing more. Garrett Bekker, principal analyst at the 451 Group, says zero trust is not a product or a technology; it’s a different way of thinking about security. “People are still wrapping their heads around what it means. Customers are confused and vendors are inconsistent on what zero trust means. But I believe it has the potential to radically alter the way security is done.”When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432

Ancient Chinese painting auctioned for almost US$60 million

Ancient Chinese painting auctioned for almost US$60 million A nearly 1,000-year-old ink painting by one of China's greatest literati masters Su Shi fetched US$59.5 million at auction, Christie's said Monday (Nov 26). To get more chinese painting, you can visit shine news official website. The auction house has described the Song Dynasty artwork created by Su as "one of the world's rarest Chinese paintings".Entitled "Wood and Rock", the ink-on-paper handscroll depicts a dragon-like old tree with withered branches and a sharp rock resting at its root. The painting was the most expensive item ever sold in Christie's Asia, it said. Su Shi, also known as Su Dongpo, is one of the most important cultural figures in Chinese history and was an esteemed scholar, poet, prose-writer, painter, calligrapher and statesman. The 185.5cm-long scroll is inscribed with calligraphy and the poems of four important literati of the 11th century in China, and also exhibits the seals of 41 collectors.The number of the works securely attributed to him are very few, probably only two or three. They are extremely rare," Jonathan Stone, deputy chairman for Christie's Asian art department, said in an earlier preview. In 2010, "Dizhuming", a Chinese calligraphy scroll by Huang Tingjian - Su Shi's student - sold for US$64 million at Poly Auction in Beijing. Hong Kong's auction houses have seen frenzied bidding among Asian buyers in recent years, with sales of diamonds, paintings and ancient ceramics shattering world records. A 10-metre-long triptych entitled "Juin-Octobre 1985" by Zao Wou-Ki - one of the 20th century's most prominent Chinese painters - fetched US$65 million at Sotheby's Hong Kong in September.

CBOT soybeans up sharply amid renewed trade hopes

CBOT soybeans up sharply amid renewed trade hopes Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) soybean futures gained double digits in the past trading week over renewed U.S.-China trade optimism, while wheat and corn fell sharply due to downbeat export sales.To get more news about cbot soybeans, you can visit shine news official website. The most active soybean contract for January delivery rose 12.75 cents during the week ending Dec. 6, or 1.45 percent, to close at 8.895 U.S. dollars per bushel. March corn was down 4.5 cents, or 1.18 percent, to settle at 3.7675 dollars per bushel. March wheat fell 17.25 cents, or 3.18 percent week on week, to end at 5.245 dollars per bushel. CBOT soybeans had suffered losses in four straight weeks. During this past week, the market was finally buoyed by renewed hopes among investors for a U.S.-China trade deal, which is crucial to the outlook of U.S. soybean exports. On Friday an announcement from the Customs Tariff Commission of China's State Council said that China, as the world's top soybean buyer, is working on tax exemptions on part of the soybeans and pork imported from the United States in light of applications submitted by related enterprises. The commission will dedicate a range of goods to be excluded from tariff countermeasures against the U.S. Section 301 measure, said the announcement. Chinese enterprises import a certain amount of goods from the United States through market-based procurement and in accordance with domestic needs. The enterprises are expected to purchase goods eligible for exemption on the basis of independent negotiation, import as they see fit, and bear the related profits or losses, it said. Technically, nearby CBOT soybean futures were at the most oversold level since last May, according to the Chicago-based agricultural research firm AgResource. Ted Seifried, chief market strategist of Zaner Ag Hedge, shared a similar view. "I think we're just simply too oversold in the soybeans. We've gotten down to price levels that I think might be too cheap." As for CBOT wheat and corn, downbeat export sales dragged down their prices. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), for the period of Nov. 22-28, the net U.S. wheat sales reached only 228,100 metric tons for the 2019/20 marketing year, down 63 percent from the previous week and 45 percent from the prior four-week average. For the same period, the net U.S. corn sales were pegged at 546,100 metric tons, down 32 percent from the previous week and 18 percent from the prior four-week average. In another USDA report, for the week ending Nov. 28, export wheat inspections totaled 246,988 metric tons, down sharply from 434,703 metric tons during the previous week. "The world market needs a spark to push (wheat prices) to new highs," AgResource wrote in a weekend note. Meanwhile, CBOT corn traders are keeping their eyes on South American weather conditions and the trade talks between Washington and Beijing, hoping that a trade deal can raise the demand for U.S. corn supplies.

Why Doesn't the Black Hole Image Look Like the One From Interstellar?

Why Doesn't the Black Hole Image Look Like the One From Interstellar? No one knew what a black hole looked like before today. Sure, we thought we knew, thanks to simulations and the now-famous black hole featured in the movie Interstellar.To get more news about interstellar black hole, you can visit shine news official website. But today, scientists behind the Event Horizon Telescope unveiled an image of the 6.5-billion-solar-mass black hole at the center of the (relatively) nearby galaxy M87. And a quick glance will show you that it doesn’t look anything like Gargantua, the black hole in the movie Interstellar. So, we asked physicists behind both images to help explain the differences. First off, if you’re completely lost, black holes are objects predicted by the theory of general relativity to have such an incredible gravitational field that light can’t escape once it enters a region called the event horizon. Today, scientists behind the Event Horizon Telescope unveiled an image of this phenomenon—not a photograph, but a reconstructed picture of the shadow that the black hole casts on the light behind it, created from data taken by eight telescopes around the world. The black hole unveiled today looked more or less exactly the way that the Event Horizon Telescope scientists, guided by Einstein’s theory of relativity, expected it to look. Like, to an impressive degree. See:They’re not as different as you might expect. “The image in Interstellar is almost correct,” Kazunori Akiyama, postdoctoral researcher at the MIT Haystack Observatory who led the team that created the EHT’s image, explained to Gizmodo. Perhaps most notably, the Interstellar black hole has a thin streak of matter around its center, which M87's black hole seems to lack. That’s a simple difference to explain—initial evidence shows that we’re viewing M87's black hole from closer to one of the poles, rather than from head on. The disk of matter around M87 would be obscured by the observation angle, Akiyama explained. Take Saturn’s rings—they don’t cross the planet when you look at it from the top or bottom. But we’re not looking at the black hole completely head on, and that’s the origin of the other main difference. M87‘s black hole seems to have a far brighter crescent-like shape on the bottom left. What you’re actually looking at is the fact that M87's black hole is probably spinning. The material orbiting the black hole would also spin, and spacetime itself would warp around the black hole. That means that material moving toward us would appear brighter, while material moving away from us would appear dimmer—which you can see in the M87 image. “Christopher Nolan omitted that brightening because the human eye would likely not be able to discern the brightness differences on the two sides of the hole when the overall brightness is so extreme,” Kip Thorne, Cal Tech physicist and advisor on the film Interstellar, told Gizmodo. Nolan did take some artistic license with the appearance of the film’s black hole, as we’ve previously explained, including things like lens flare. But there are other differences as well, explained Thorne. The black hole envisioned by Thorne had a much thinner, opaque disk of material. The black hole observed by the Event Horizon Telescope team appears to have a much thicker disk, but one that is somewhat more transparent to light. These are relatively minor points. The Event Horizon Telescope will continue to take images, both of M87's black hole and of the black hole at the center of our own galaxy, the Milky Way. These images will create even clearer pictures—and will surely help science fiction produce more accurate visions of black holes than ever before.

Opera for Android update brings unlimited VPN service

Opera for Android update brings unlimited VPN service Almost two years after adding free and unlimited VPN to its desktop browser Opera for Android is getting the same treatment. Version 51 of Opera for Android, will finally bring VPN service to the mobile browser, in continuation of the company's commitment to user security.Buy VPN Opera claims you will have enhanced control over your online privacy, notably when connecting to public Wi-Fi networks. The VPN service is of the no log variety, meaning it will not store any user data on Opera's servers. To start using the new feature, simply download or update your current app and head over to settings where you will now see a VPN sub-menu. Once activated, the 256-bit encryption will create a secure private connection between the user’s device and the remote VPN server.VPN download The feature will not allow you to mask your location to a specific country but simply offer three regions - America, Asia and Europe.When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432

NordVPN’s Breach and the Limitations of VPNs

NordVPN’s Breach and the Limitations of VPNs The popular VPN provider, NordVPN, recently announced a server breach at a third-party data center. NordVPN reassured users that its key services were not impacted by this breach in particular, however, NordVPN users credentials were used with credential stuffing attacks. NordVPN stresses that there is no indication the breach and the credential stuffing attacks are related. Concerned users can check to see if their credentials were leaked from previous breaches .fast VPN News of the breach has inspired questions around which tool is best for safety and security online. With commercial VPNs now saturating the market and many people being more concerned with their privacy, it’s important for users to know how VPNs work, and what their limitations are. VPNs can be useful in a user’s safety toolset, but there are some fundamental capabilities that are critical to understand: what VPNs do, what VPNs don’t do, and how a VPN service can better protect their users. What VPNs Are A virtual private network (or VPN) is a method for connecting your computer securely to the network of an organization on the other side of the Internet. When you connect to a VPN, all of your web browsing data appears to originate from the VPN itself, rather than your own Internet Service Provider (or ISP). Sensitive information could include submissions from contact forms or credit card information. Using a VPN masks the IP address assigned by your ISP from the sites that you access, adding a layer of privacy. Along with masking your origin IP address, it also encrypts your data while in transit to the site you are accessing. What VPNs Can Do If you are accessing sites on a public wifi network, such as a cafe, a VPN can help to protect your data from observers connected to that network. It can also help circumvent Internet censorship on a network that blocks certain sites or services, such as when you are working from a school’s Internet connection or in a country that blocks certain kinds of content. Before they came into higher commercial demand, VPNs were and still are used by corporations, so that their employees can access corporate-specific sites and services within their intranet. What VPNs Can’t Do Since commercial VPNs often have servers in different countries, their logs may be subject to law enforcement requests. In these cases, VPNs cannot fully prevent surveillance or access from law enforcement, nor can they completely anonymize your identity. Even though your browsing data is encrypted, it doesn’t mean that a VPN entirely shields who you are. You could still be subject to different kinds of tracking such as browser fingerprinting. It’s also important to note that VPNs and any other data-in-transit encryption methods such as usage of HTTPS:// sites do not ensure the integrity of the site you are visiting. VPNs cannot protect you from malicious attacks to a site’s servers or their compromised networks.When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432

Russia’s censorship agency demands that VPN services comply

Russia’s censorship agency demands that VPN services comply Roskomnadzor, the agency responsible for communications regulation and censorship in Russia, announced today that it contacted a number of VPN services to request that they subscribe to the agency’s registry of websites that are banned from distribution on Russian territory. Though Roskomnadzor has blocked VPN services before and asked Internet service providers to comply with its registry of blocked sites, this is the first time it has made the same demands of VPN providers.VPN The agency’s announcement mentions several popular services: NordVPN, Hide My Ass!, Hola VPN, Openvpn, VyprVPN, ExpressVPN, TorGuard, IPVanish, Kaspersky Secure Connection и VPN Unlimited. Openvpn is not technically a VPN service, but it allows users to create a VPN network. Roskomnadzor has given the services contacted 30 business days to fulfill its demands. The agency’s press secretary, Vadim Ampelonsky, told Interfax that companies that do not comply may see access to their services limited in Russia.When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432

Your VPN service may be leaking private data to third parties

Your VPN service may be leaking private data to third parties If you believe that your virtual private network (VPN) is the Fort Knox of the online world that will keep your data safe and private, you may want to think again. Designed to secure connections between networks over the internet and keep a user’s online activities private, VPNs find favour among companies as well as individuals. However, not all VPN platforms are secure.VPN download “A wrong VPN provider could eavesdrop on a user’s online activity and sensitive information, sell this information on the dark web to adverting agencies, or to intelligence agencies. Using a poorly secured VPN service can expose users to a lot more damage than using no VPN at all," cautions Ritesh Chopra, country manager, consumer business unit at security firm Symantec. He has a point. In any VPN network, a user’s computer may belong to him or her, but the exit node (remote server) belongs to the VPN provider that chooses the encryption algorithms and VPN protocols. So the security of the server is up to the provider, explains Leonard Sim, head of pre-sales (APAC) at cybersecurity firm Kaspersky. He adds, “You have to trust your provider as much as you trust yourself. You need to know that the provider isn’t sniffing or modifying your traffic, that it doesn’t log everything, and that it uses reliable protocols and strong encryption." This April, for instance, US government’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) cautioned about VPN applications that were insecurely storing session cookies. The agency warned that if cybercriminals gain access to a VPN user’s endpoint and extracts the cookies, they can replay the session and bypass other authentication methods. Nevertheless, the increase in the adoption of VPN—be it for privacy, bypassing ISPs or to gain access to online content available in other countries—has also given rise to a breed of counterfeit VPNs. On the surface, these VPNs will seem genuine, but in reality they might be logging all user activity, with the intention to sell it to the highest bidders. “Although VPNs remain one of the most effective means of maintaining online privacy, there is a possibility that they too can be hacked, particularly if they are built using any vulnerable, open-source VPN libraries," cautions Venkat Krishnapur, vice-president of engineering and MD at cybersecurity firm McAfee India.Buy VPN The VORACLE attack is one such example where vulnerability in the VPN protocol was exploited. Tech security researcher Ahamed Nafeez mimicked the attack that targeted VPN tunnels last year. Krishnapur believes paid VPNs are a better bet as they include features equipped to stop password and data thefts, prevent IP-based tracking and have options to automatically disconnect a user-device from the internet until the VPN connection is restored, and prevent accidental exposure. Experts believe users should be cautious of VPN services facing regular domain name system (DNS) leaks, connectivity issues and IP leaks as well as those that offer lower levels of encryption. Reading their licence agreement carefully before using them also helps.When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432

Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking?

Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking? I wanted to know if I should use a VPN (virtual private network) to connect to my bank website. A service I came across called claims that they will encrypt my connection, but I don't know if they can be trusted or not. What do you think? PS: I love your daily infopackets letters - they are very informative. "unblock websites This is a good question. When visiting I noted the following statements on their site: "Safer Web gives you an extra layer of security against Internet hackers. By hiding your IP, we keep your online activity anonymous and private. Using a VPN keeps your browsing activity private and secure."Those statements certainly make it sound like it would be triple secure connecting to your bank, but I suggest otherwise. I'll try to answer that question in depth below; in fact, I'll even answer the question "Should I use a VPN?" as well (even if not connecting to a bank), for those who are considering using a VPN service How does a VPN Work? A VPN (virtual private network) is software that connects your computer to another computer (a VPN server) somewhere else in the world. The connection between your computer and the VPN server is encrypted. That is what a VPN is, but a pay-for VPN service offered by a third party is slightly different. Let's look at an example: Let's say you purchased a VPN service online. Let's also assume that the VPN service has VPN servers located all over world - and there's even one located in China, which you decide to connect to, for lack of better judgment. So, let's assume you decide to launch Internet Explorer and access in the browser. When you access using your VPN connection, the server in China is asked to carry out that request. From there, which it then relays that information ADVERTISEMENT Regarding the asterisk in the previous section above (see: connection*): does not use secure http (https) to serve its web pages, the only thing "secure" is your connection between you and the VPN server in China. In other words, using a VPN to access a non-secure website will only anonymize the traffic between you and the VPN server - should you be worried about being spied upon; it does not provide a secure connection from the VPN server outward UNLESS the connection outward uses https to serve up its web pages . The website will only serve up https webpages if it uses a security certificate (SSL) that has been signed by a certificate authority.When comes to the issue of online privacy and security, we suggest to use a VPN, and our recommendation is RitaVPN.Qwer432